Health Care Reform as a Technology Innovation Stimulus

---Paul Dausman, CEO, Valiant Health  See also http://www.valianthealth.com/blog/health-care-reform-as-a-technology-innovation-stimulus/

The regulatory and compliance requirements emanating from the Affordable Care Act, coupled with incentives for providers to move manual processes to automated ones has stimulated the growth of technology and service vendors to enable health care businesses to stay in the game.  Some entrepreneurial vendors are aiming their innovative solutions at the patient; others are focused on the doctor’s office and the information which is needed while care is being rendered.  Many are focused on cost management, fraud detection, or waste reduction at the population health or plan level.    

It has occurred to me, however, that solutions that consume the publicly available data and that data gathered by the doctor or member at the point of care will afford only a part of what is needed. 

In fact, the change (as described in the New York Times Opinion piece link below) that is coming will require a complete re-engineering from the top to the bottom of the existing health plan and provider care models.  Healthcare Performance Management (HCMP) systems will enable all parties within a program to be on the same page in terms of developing priorities and sound action plans. 

Thomas L. Friedman noted in his NYT article that while the US has had the best but most expensive health care in the world, the goal of the new health care law is to “flip this fee-for-services system (which some insurance companies are emulating) to one where the government pays doctors and hospitals to keep Medicare patients healthy and the services they do render are reimbursed more for their value than volume.”

Proving that the “flip” is successful or just “cheaper” is going to require data, fed into HCMP systems that will shine a light on what health care organizations need to do first and whether or not they are risking failure over the course of time in any specific measurable area or for any specific patient.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/26/opinion/sunday/friedman-obamacares-other-surprise.html?ref=thomaslfriedman&_r=1&

Paul Dausman is the CEO of Valiant Health, LLC, and has an extensive history as an entrepreneur in the health care and information technology areas.

Dueling Data Games: Demographics vs. Provider Patterns?

---John Campo, Vice President, Business Development, Valiant Health  (see also http://www.valianthealth.com/blog/dueling-data-games-demographics-vs-provider-patterns1/)

Various forums like Health IT, academia, and the health care bloggers are abuzz with a fascinating, but controversial study released on May 28, 2013 that addresses the long held belief that some regions have wasteful medical practice patterns. The new paper concludes that individuals’ health differences around the country explain between 75 percent and 85 percent of the cost variations.  When the primary author, Dr. Patrick Romano, noted that “People really are sicker in some parts of the country,” he set in motion a debate with the conventional wisdom against the work of the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice.  Dartmouth’s three decades of research has propagated a theory that regional differences in Medicare spending is mostly due to the aggressiveness of the medical community (and attributing it mostly to individual profit incentives).

The answer to this question is critical because it is driving CMS strategies to reduce Medicare spending.  The Institute of Medicine, at the request of Congress, is continuing to investigate the question.  

Regardless of whether the new study turns out to be correct or if the IOM substantiates the findings of the Dartmouth group, it makes for an interesting debate with high stakes in terms of CMS payment strategies.  Plans, ACOs, and all types of providers will be involved in looking at data in various ways like local/provider specific analyses to regional/national benchmarks.  Providers should expect to conduct patient and population level analyses and measure results, comparing them to expected norms and explaining the variances.

 This will be particularly important as providers and plans engage in any kind of pay-for-performance or risk sharing arrangements, such as those expected under Accountable Care Organizations.  They must have systems in place to offer point-counter-point perspectives that establish quality results and justify the occasional outlier.  Link for different perspectives:   

• http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/pop-health-explains-medicare-disparities?topic=04,28,19
• http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Stories/2013/May/28/medicare-state-geographic-variation-costs.aspx

John Campo is responsible for Valiant Health’s growth, including client engagement and satisfaction. He brings over 15 years of diversified healthcare experience to Valiant Health. Prior to joining our leadership team, John founded and owned the CAMPO Group: Strategic Managed Care Consultants where he engaged leading pharmaceutical, biotechnology, specialty pharmacy, and health insurance clients. John’s background includes healthcare contracting, trade relations, reimbursement, specialty pharmacy distribution, quality improvement and Medicare. His leadership background includes working for a Fortune 500 PBM, HMO, and Specialty Pharmacy organization in leadership roles as well as being responsible for Managed Markets National Account Management for a large ethical US Pharmaceutical firm. He holds a BS in Business from Brescia University. 

Hospital Readmission Penalties Create Continued Policy Debate

---Terri Bernacchi, PharmD, MBA,  Senior Partner, Valiant Health (See also:  http://www.valianthealth.com/blog/hospital-readmission-penalties-create-continued-policy-debate/ )

 

A by-product of CMS’ cost reduction efforts associated with payment (or penalty) for quality results, is the much vilified Star Rating measure on All-Cause Hospital Readmissions. These efforts hit the Medicare Advantage plan’s Star Ratings results but also impact hospitals Medicare reimbursement rates directly. 

Two-thirds of hospitals are now facing readmission penalties totaling approximately $280 million in 2013, according to experts.  These 2,271 U.S. hospitals were found to have readmission rates higher than the CMS models predicted, and each of them will receive a penalty this year, as high as 1% of their reimbursement for Medicare patients. (Penalties will increase to 3% by 2015.)

The number of hospitals penalized is much higher than most observers would have anticipated on the basis of CMS's previous public reports, which identified less than 5% of hospitals as outliers.  (See NEJM Article by Drs. Karen E Joynt, MD & Ashish K. Jha, MD)  Path Forward on Medicare Readmissions at http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1300122 )

The debate includes concerns that the safety-net hospitals caring for a higher proportion of members with socio-economic challenges are those least able to afford a penalty. Most agree, however, that setting a lower quality standard for these hospitals would not be ideal.   Many hospitals (and associated Medicare Advantage Plans) now have placed special focus on “helping patients make the transition from inpatient care to outpatient or community settings”.  A key part of this coordination is the ability to identify and intervene early in the hospitalization and post-discharge course.

See Links:  http://www.chrt.org/blog/the-aca-and-the-hospital-readmissions-policy-debate/

          http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/30/business/hospitals-question-fairness-of-new-medicare-rules.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Terri is a Senior Partner at Valiant Health, LLC, and founder of Cambria Health Advisory Professionals.  The thoughts put forth on these postings are not necessarily reflective of the views of her employers or clients nor other Valiant Health colleagues. Terri has had a varied career in health related settings including: 9 years in a clinical hospital pharmacy setting, 3 years as a pharmaceutical sales rep serving government, wholesaler, managed markets and traditional physician sales, 3 years working for the executive team of an integrated health system working with physician practices, 4 years as the director of pharmacy for a large BCBS plan, 12 years of experience as founder and primary servant of a health technology company which was sold to IMS Health in late 2007.  She has both a BS and a PharmD in Pharmacy and an MBA. 

Health Systems Around the World Could Learn From MA

John Campo, Vice President, Business Development, Valiant Health (See: http://www.valianthealth.com/blog/health-systems-around-the-world-could-learn-from-ma-plans/)

A new study by the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) suggests that health systems around the world can learn a lot from the care-delivery models used by private payers in U.S. Medicare Advantage plans. 

BCG concluded that Medicare Advantage plans, which impose classic managed care techniques to an elderly population, as compared to traditional Medicare fee-for-service plans, vary in a couple of key ways. 

1. Focused on mechanisms designed to encourage the delivery of cost-effective quality care
2. Identify  and focus on clinical best practices
3. Tap into a selective network of providers
4. Apply active care management strategies based on prevention to minimize expensive acute care

BCG’s study included an analysis of claims data for 3 million Medicare patients. They concluded that on three internationally accepted dimensions of health care quality—single-year mortality, recovery from acute episodes of care requiring hospitalization, and the sustainability of health over time—patients enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans had better outcomes than those participating in Medicare on a traditional fee-for-service basis.

Medicare Advantage plans in the US are under continued scrutiny to “prove” quality by meeting established benchmarks for various domains, including patient satisfaction, quality outcomes, access to care, and use of preventive services.  MA plan executives are faced with fee reductions if quality metrics are not met under “Star Ratings” programs imposed by CMS.

See Links:  http://finchannel.com/Main_News/Business/127573_Managed_Medicare_Advantage_Plans_Demonstrate_Better_Outcomes_for_Patients/
http://www.bcg.com/media/PressReleaseDetails.aspx?id=tcm:12-134145

John Campo is responsible for Valiant Health’s growth, including client engagement and satisfaction. He brings over 15 years of diversified healthcare experience to Valiant Health. Prior to joining our leadership team, John founded and owned the CAMPO Group: Strategic Managed Care Consultants where he engaged leading pharmaceutical, biotechnology, specialty pharmacy, and health insurance clients. John’s background includes healthcare contracting, trade relations, reimbursement, specialty pharmacy distribution, quality improvement and Medicare. His leadership background includes working for a Fortune 500 PBM, HMO, and Specialty Pharmacy organization in leadership roles as well as being responsible for Managed Markets National Account Management for a large ethical US Pharmaceutical firm. He holds a BS in Business from Brescia University.

Achieving 5 Stars on the Rx Side—The Secret?

---Terri Bernacchi, PharmD, MBA,  Senior Partner, Valiant Health (www.valianthealth.com )

http://www.valianthealth.com/blog/achieving-5-stars-on-the-rx-sidethe-secret/

To succeed in an increasingly challenging reimbursement environment, Medicare Advantage plans must work in close collaboration with physicians to identify at-risk populations and facilitate interventions that that improve quality and lower cost.  That is true for both the Part C & Part D portions of the program.

Some Medicare Advantage plans will thrive at the top of the quality ratings heap no matter what happens in the surrounding environment.  Those plans have some common elements that give them a weighty advantage in terms of statistics and actual results.  The common themes?  Cooperative providers, clean data management processes, enabled clinical teams and executive leadership, and a clear, prioritized plan.  In a phrase, they are able to exert maximal control over the variables that drive results which drive reimbursements.  

Kaiser Permanente, for example, attributes its success to “a deep understanding of the star measures along with internal and external organizational processes and protocols”.  They believe this has allowed the plan to achieve a Part D summary rating of 5 in 7 of the 8 regions. 

Matt Nye, the vice president of Pharmacy Care Support Services, National Pharmacy Programs and Services of Kaiser Permanente spoke at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy’s spring meeting in San Diego in April 2013.  His discussion included a brief company overview: coverage of 9 states and D.C. with 8.9 million members, 165,000 employees, 15,000 physicians, 36 hospitals and medical centers, and 1.05 million Medicare members. Nye noted that Kaiser’s program includes outpatient, inpatient, and ambulatory care pharmacies and services, home infusion, drug distribution, mail order and central fill operations, and centralized services.

Kaiser has some advantages in drug therapy management relating to its business model:  it is an integrated practice model.  He noted that they have placed an emphasis sharing accountability between physicians and pharmacists to ensure the appropriate use of medications. 

Even if a plan does not have the benefit of “owning” the full scope of clinical, distributive, and practice infrastructure, the lessons learned from Kaiser can still be applied.  Using technology and data management techniques, internal and organizational processes can be aligned to create common incentives and opportunities to maximize quality results to assure success in the current and future years.

Link:  http://www.ajmc.com/conferences/AMCP_Spring-2013/Optimizing-Care-Deliver-with-Medicare-Star-Ratings-The-Successes-and-Challenges-of-Managed-Care-Organizations

Terri is a Senior Partner at Valiant Health, LLC, and founder of Cambria Health Advisory Professionals.  The thoughts put forth on these postings are not necessarily reflective of the views of her employers or clients nor other Valiant Health colleagues. Terri has had a varied career in health related settings including: 9 years in a clinical hospital pharmacy setting, 3 years as a pharmaceutical sales rep serving government, wholesaler, managed markets and traditional physician sales, 3 years working for the executive team of an integrated health system working with physician practices, 4 years as the director of pharmacy for a large BCBS plan, 12 years experience as founder and primary servant of a health technology company which was sold to IMS Health in late 2007.  She has both a BS and a PharmD in Pharmacy and an MBA. 

Cambria Releases White Paper: Health Care Reform & Star Ratings for Health Plans: How to Manage Through the Murkiness of Medicare’s New Realities

---Terri Bernacchi, PharmD, MBA, Cambria Health Advisory Professionals, Managing Partner at Quo Magis Partners

The entire white paper can be downloaded at the following link:  http://www.sharedhealthdecisions.com/5273/5294.html   This excerpt highlights the “5 Essential Pillars for Success” for Medicare Advantage plans. 

The Five Essential Pillars

Any team can only cope with what they understand.  Breaking the Star Ratings program down into bite-size pieces will make tackling these components more achievable so that challenges can be overcome and measure results maximized.   A manager should delegate specific goals to specific team members, so that no one person must manage it all.  In our estimation, there are five principals that can be applied to this effort.   Without any one of the following components in a fully operational state, a plan cannot hope to improve its rating: 

1.    Cohesive Team Pulling in the Same Direction

·         Plan executives must clearly state the goals, designate team members at all levels of the operation, in every department.  

·         Results should be part of the team and individual incentive /merit program.

·         Redundancy of critical functions should be built into the team, to plan for potential staff attrition in critical places.  An understudy will always be in place and ready for a chance “at bat”.    

2.     Communication-Up, Down, Sideways

·         Tracking results and targets requires careful and consistent communication of initiatives. 

·         In addition to routine meetings, email blasts, and conferences, the program or star manager must be willing to nudge already overworked colleagues to meet milestones and deadlines.

·         Communication requires careful listening to members, providers, technologists, and managers.  Sometimes the challenge itself has been misidentified, requiring a shift in strategy.  Without careful listening, the team could plow on in the wrong direction and completely miss the mark. 

3.    Access to Data- Timely & Accurate

·         Because there are a number of places where data is imported, cross- walked, converted, transferred to vendors or auditors, and later to CMS, any dropped or misaligned data could cost the plan meaningful points on the numerator or denominator.   

·         Processes to assure that the data is complete and accurate from the claims systems, which validate what is supplied to CMS, should be executed at least monthly to confirm the current state. This will also allow managers to tackle the measures which will have the greatest impact or which represent low hanging fruit for achieving results. 

·         Managers and Star Team Members need ready-access to that data so that they can troubleshoot problems or success early.

·         Instill in the team a little dose of “data skepticism” such that they don’t just accept results that “don’t look right”.  Waiting to identify a data process problem may result in a lack of time to act. 

4.    A Means to Navigate:  Technology/ Software

·         Access to data is not enough without a means to manage it.  The executive has a need to identify which providers are helping or hurting; which measures are lagging or improving; which team members are achieving results (or not).  

·         By identifying the challenges, managers can assign the most adept teams to focus on results at the provider, member, data or campaign level.   

·         Software that can capture the data, identify the priorities, and assign the resources to resolving them is an essential tool in achieving results, when implemented into Standard Operating Procedures.  Without such software, a team must rely upon many manual processes that could be costly to manage, with key tasks subject to “slipping through the cracks”.

5.    A Roadmap:  “Hope is NOT a good strategy”

·         Once a plan manager knows where the results lie, and where the gaps are, there is a need for the team to know what to do about it and how to do it.

·         The Roadmaps or “Campaigns” that a plan constructs to address specific measures should identify a strategy for pursuit of the mathematical result, incorporating tactics that may involve the provider community, the staff outreach department or the member himself. 

These campaigns imply an action-orientation whereby one is not just looking at the data, but is deploying resources under a specific program to achieve named and documented targets, perhaps over a short period, or over the whole year. 

More information regarding Valiant Health’s ProActive® Management technology can be found at www.valianthealth.com.

Terri is the founder of Cambria Health Advisory Professionals, and a Managing Partner at Quo Magis Partners. Among her current clients: a large health sciences firm serving payers, pharmaceutical and device manufacturers and other stakeholders, a small special needs health plan as a 5 Star Consultant, and several other health related clients. The thoughts put forth on these postings are not necessarily reflective of the views of her employers or clients nor other Health Advisory Professional colleagues. Terri has had a varied career in health related settings including: 9 years in a clinical hospital pharmacy setting, 3 years as a pharmaceutical sales rep serving government, wholesaler, managed markets and traditional physician sales, 3 years working for the executive team of an integrated health system working with physician practices, 4 years as the director of pharmacy for a large BCBS plan, 12 years experience as founder and primary servant of a health technology company which was sold to her current employer three years ago. She has both a BS and a PharmD in Pharmacy and an MBA.